Next: Bibliography
Up: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
Previous: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
We are concerned here with the oscillatory character of certain
solutions of scalar differential equations of the form
 |
(1) |
where
is a given strictly increasing map defined for
for some
We also assume that
and
for
Eq. (1) is a particular
form of a ``retarded differential equation", the delay in time
being provided by the argument
and it is a special kind
of a functional differential equation of the type
 |
(2) |
where
is the ``tail" map (as it is given, for instance, in
[6]),
A particular instance of the more general situation to be
investigated in this paper, was studied in [2], namely,
the ``scaled differential equation"
 |
(3) |
where
and
are given real numbers. Here, we have
and
The nomenclature for Eq. (3) is due to
the change of scale in time of the argument
Variations of
this equation have been used in some mathematical models for
pantograph equipment ([3,4,5,9,10,13,14,15]). Eq. (1) has an interesting feature: two different
kinds of initial value problem (IVP) can be attached to it,
namely, the punctual IVP ``
" or the functional IVP
``
where
is arbitrarily chosen in
or
is arbitrarily chosen in
and
is an arbitrary real constant, with
Here, as usual,
stands for
the space of the continuous maps from
into
equipped
with the supremum norm
One
often refers to either
or
as an
``initial condition". This duality of IVPs directly leads to the
phenomenon of collapse of backward continuation ([2]),
responsible for a wild kind of oscillatory behavior of solutions
of Eq. (1), as we shall see. In order to make notations simpler,
we extend the above nomenclature of
by putting
and so on.
By a ``solution" of the punctual IVP we mean a differentiable map
defined in an interval
which, of course, satisfies Eq. (1) for
and
The derivative at
means, of course, the right
hand derivative while the derivative at
is the left hand one.
As usual, the notations
and
denote the
right-hand and the left-hand derivative of
at
respectively. Similarly, a ``solution" of the functional IVP is a
continuous map
such that
is differentiable in
and, of course, satisfies
with the derivative at
being the right-hand one, etc.. To emphasize the dependence on
and
of this solution we shall denote it by
``
" The solution of the punctual IVP will be
denoted simply by ``
" We assume from now the
following conditions:
Hypothesis (H): (i)-
is
continuous in
and
with respect to
for
(this condition implies that
is
locally Lipschitz, i.e., for each compact rectangle
and
there is a constant
such that
where
denotes the modulus or absolute value map);
(ii)-
for all
((ii) implies that
is strictly monotone);
(iii)-
is surjective; (iv)-
and (v)-
is
. Assumption (iv)
implies that
is a solution of Eq. (1), which is
called ``the trivial (or null) solution" and it is the unique
solution for both the punctual IVP ``
" and the
functional IVP ``
as it will become clear in the
sequel. This equilibrium is denoted by
Note that (ii), (iii) and (iv), together, imply that the
sets
and
are nonempty, disjoint and
To fix the ideas, we may think, without loss of
generality, that:
Hypothesis (G):
and
Note that since
is continuous, it follows that
for each
.
If we compare the above conditions with the simpler ones in
[2], where the authors made use of the stronger semigroup
property which holds for linear delay equations, we see that the
present conditions are not yet sufficient to guarantee backward
continuation of a large set of initial conditions, as it is
in the linear case. In this paper we use a special property called
piling property to be defined, as well as applications of
implicit function theorems, to extend the results to a much more
general class of problems.
Next: Bibliography
Up: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
Previous: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
Nobuki Takayama
2002-04-24