Next: Bibliography
Up: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
Previous: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
We are concerned here with the oscillatory character of certain
solutions of scalar differential equations of the form
|
(1) |
where is a given strictly increasing map defined for
for some
We also assume that
and
for Eq. (1) is a particular
form of a ``retarded differential equation", the delay in time
being provided by the argument and it is a special kind
of a functional differential equation of the type
|
(2) |
where is the ``tail" map (as it is given, for instance, in
[6]),
A particular instance of the more general situation to be
investigated in this paper, was studied in [2], namely,
the ``scaled differential equation"
|
(3) |
where and are given real numbers. Here, we have
and The nomenclature for Eq. (3) is due to
the change of scale in time of the argument Variations of
this equation have been used in some mathematical models for
pantograph equipment ([3,4,5,9,10,13,14,15]). Eq. (1) has an interesting feature: two different
kinds of initial value problem (IVP) can be attached to it,
namely, the punctual IVP ``" or the functional IVP
``
where is arbitrarily chosen in
or
is arbitrarily chosen in
and is an arbitrary real constant, with
Here, as usual,
stands for
the space of the continuous maps from into
equipped
with the supremum norm
One
often refers to either or as an
``initial condition". This duality of IVPs directly leads to the
phenomenon of collapse of backward continuation ([2]),
responsible for a wild kind of oscillatory behavior of solutions
of Eq. (1), as we shall see. In order to make notations simpler,
we extend the above nomenclature of by putting
and so on.
By a ``solution" of the punctual IVP we mean a differentiable map defined in an interval
which, of course, satisfies Eq. (1) for and
The derivative at means, of course, the right
hand derivative while the derivative at is the left hand one.
As usual, the notations and denote the
right-hand and the left-hand derivative of at
respectively. Similarly, a ``solution" of the functional IVP is a
continuous map
such that
is differentiable in and, of course, satisfies
with the derivative at
being the right-hand one, etc.. To emphasize the dependence on
and of this solution we shall denote it by
``
" The solution of the punctual IVP will be
denoted simply by ``" We assume from now the
following conditions:
Hypothesis (H): (i)- is
continuous in and with respect to for
(this condition implies that
is
locally Lipschitz, i.e., for each compact rectangle
and
there is a constant such that
where denotes the modulus or absolute value map);
(ii)-
for all
((ii) implies that is strictly monotone);
(iii)- is surjective; (iv)-
and (v)- is . Assumption (iv)
implies that is a solution of Eq. (1), which is
called ``the trivial (or null) solution" and it is the unique
solution for both the punctual IVP ``" and the
functional IVP `` as it will become clear in the
sequel. This equilibrium is denoted by
Note that (ii), (iii) and (iv), together, imply that the
sets
and
are nonempty, disjoint and
To fix the ideas, we may think, without loss of
generality, that:
Hypothesis (G):
and
Note that since is continuous, it follows that
for each .
If we compare the above conditions with the simpler ones in
[2], where the authors made use of the stronger semigroup
property which holds for linear delay equations, we see that the
present conditions are not yet sufficient to guarantee backward
continuation of a large set of initial conditions, as it is
in the linear case. In this paper we use a special property called
piling property to be defined, as well as applications of
implicit function theorems, to extend the results to a much more
general class of problems.
Next: Bibliography
Up: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
Previous: Collapsible Backward Continuation and
Nobuki Takayama
2002-04-24