In this paper we study the global behavior of solutions to the
reaction-diffusion system :
In the system (1.1) and
are
nonnegative functions which represent the population densities of two competing
species.
and
are the diffusion rates of the two species,
respectively.
and
denote the intrinsic growth rates,
and
account for intra-specific competitions,
and
are the coefficients
for inter-specific competitions. For details on the backgrounds of this model,
we refer the reader to [6].
Remark. The linear functions for and
as in
are often used in the classical competition-diffusion
systems. Though the quadratic functions for
and
as in
may not be used commonly, they make the system (1.1)
the
gradient system of an energy functional (after simple scalings) which helps
one to analyze the system (1.1) more clearly. And, in the course of this
paper it will be shown that the system (1.1) with
has
similar properties as the system with
.
The global behavior of solutions to the system (1.1) is related to that of its kinetic system which is the following system of ordinary differential equations :
For the general properties of separatrix of the kinetic
system (1.2) which is illustrated in Figure 1
we refer the reader to the result due to Iida et al. [2] which is stated
in Proposition 1.1 in the following. The reader may also refer to
Hirsch and Smale [1], Ninomiya [5] for the
properties of separatrices.
In order to state our main results we introduce the notation which will be
used throughout this paper, and reduce the system (1.1) with
and the strong competition condition (1.3) to a simpler form.
Notation. We set
, where
is a strictly increasing
-function with
. We denote
the tangent line of
at the unstable
constant equilibrium
in the phase plane.
The competition-diffusion system (1.1) with
and linear competitions as in
is reduced to the following system :
The competition-diffusion systems (1.1) with
and
quadratic competitions as in
is reduced to the following system :
For both systems (1.4) and (1.5) the strong competition condition (1.3) is reduced to
Remark. In the proofs of
Theorems 1.1 and 1.2
the concavity of the graph of the function plays an important role.
Regarding the system (1.4) the concavity of
is proved by
Iida et al. [2] as stated in Proposition 2.1. We prove similar
but partial result for the system (1.5) in Proposition 2.2.
A sufficient condition on the coefficients
,
,
to guarantee
that
for
is found in Proposition 2.2 (vi).
The properties of separatrix which are needed during the constructions of
domains of attraction are studied in Section 2.
In Section 3 we obtain the invariance of the set
for the flow (1.4) and (1.5). We present lemmas regarding
auxiliary functions which are used in the proofs of Theorem 1.1
and Theorem 1.2 in Section 4. The proofs of
Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 are given in
Section 5 and 6, respectively.