version 1.2, 2001/11/19 10:00:02 |
version 1.9, 2001/12/28 06:06:15 |
|
|
% $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/Papers/dag-noro-proc.tex,v 1.1 2001/11/19 01:02:30 noro Exp $ |
% $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/Papers/dag-noro-proc.tex,v 1.8 2001/11/30 02:08:46 noro Exp $ |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
% This is a sample input file for your contribution to a multi- |
% This is a sample input file for your contribution to a multi- |
% author book to be published by Springer Verlag. |
% author book to be published by Springer Verlag. |
|
|
% allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long |
% allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long |
% to fit in the running head |
% to fit in the running head |
% |
% |
\author{Masayuki Noro\inst{1}} |
\author{Masayuki Noro} |
% |
% |
%\authorrunning{Masayuki Noro} |
%\authorrunning{Masayuki Noro} |
% if there are more than two authors, |
% if there are more than two authors, |
|
|
\maketitle % typesets the title of the contribution |
\maketitle % typesets the title of the contribution |
|
|
\begin{abstract} |
\begin{abstract} |
OpenXM \cite{OPENXM} is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical |
Risa/Asir is software for polynomial computation. It has been |
|
developed for testing experimental polynomial algorithms, and now it |
|
acts also as a main component in the OpenXM package \cite{OPENXM}. |
|
OpenXM is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical |
data. It defines a client-server architecture for parallel and |
data. It defines a client-server architecture for parallel and |
distributed computation. Risa/Asir is software for polynomial |
distributed computation. In this article we present an overview of |
computation. It has been developed for testing new algorithms, and now |
Risa/Asir and review several techniques for improving performances of |
it acts as both a client and a server in the OpenXM package. In this |
Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}. We also show Risa/Asir's |
article we present an overview of Risa/Asir and its performances on |
OpenXM interfaces and their usages. |
several functions. We also show Risa/Asir's OpenXM interfaces and |
|
examples of usages of them. |
|
\end{abstract} |
\end{abstract} |
|
|
\section{A computer algebra system Risa/Asir} |
\section{A computer algebra system Risa/Asir} |
Line 105 examples of usages of them. |
|
Line 106 examples of usages of them. |
|
Risa/Asir \cite{RISA} is software mainly for polynomial |
Risa/Asir \cite{RISA} is software mainly for polynomial |
computation. Its major functions are polynomial factorization and |
computation. Its major functions are polynomial factorization and |
Groebner basis computation, whose core parts are implemented as |
Groebner basis computation, whose core parts are implemented as |
builtin functions. Some higher algorithms such as primary ideal |
built-in functions. Some higher algorithms such as primary ideal |
decomposition or Galois group computation are built on them by the |
decomposition or Galois group computation are built on them by the |
user language. The user language is called Asir language. Asir |
user language called Asir language. Asir language can be regarded as C |
language can be regarded as C language without type declaration of |
language without type declaration of variables, with list processing, |
variables, with list processing, and with automatic garbage |
and with automatic garbage collection. A built-in {\tt gdb}-like user |
collection. A builtin {\tt gdb}-like user language debugger is |
language debugger is available. Risa/Asir is open source and the |
available. It is open source and the source code and binaries are |
source code and binaries are available via {\tt ftp} or {\tt CVS}. |
available via ftp or CVS. |
Risa/Asir is not only a standalone computer algebra system but also a |
Risa/Asir is not only an standalone computer algebra system but also a |
|
main component in OpenXM package \cite{OPENXM}, which is a collection |
main component in OpenXM package \cite{OPENXM}, which is a collection |
of software comliant to OpenXM protocol specification. OpenXM is an |
of various software compliant to OpenXM protocol specification. |
infrastructure for exchanging mathematical data and Risa/Asir has |
OpenXM is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical data and |
three kind of OpenXM intefaces : an inteface as a server, as a cllient |
Risa/Asir has three kinds of OpenXM interfaces : as a client, as a |
and as a subroutine library. We will explain them in the later |
server, and as a subroutine library. Our goals of developing Risa/Asir |
section. |
are as follows: |
|
|
Our goals of developing Risa/Asir are as follows: |
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate} |
\begin{enumerate} |
\item Providing a test bed of new algorithms |
\item Providing a platform for testing new algorithms |
|
|
Risa/Asir has been a platform for testing experimental algorithms in |
Risa/Asir has been a platform for testing experimental algorithms in |
polynomial factorization, computation related to Groebner basis, |
polynomial factorization, Groebner basis computation, |
cryptography and quantifier elimination. As to Groebner basis, we have |
cryptography and quantifier elimination. As to Groebner basis, we have |
been mainly interested in problems over {\bf Q} and we tried applying |
been mainly interested in problems over {\bf Q} and we tried applying |
various modular techniques to overcome difficulties caused by huge |
various modular techniques to overcome difficulties caused by huge |
intermediate coefficients. We have had several results and they have |
intermediate coefficients. We have had several results and they have |
been implemented in Risa/Asir. |
been implemented in Risa/Asir with other known methods. |
|
|
\item Gereral purpose open system |
\item General purpose open system |
|
|
We need a lot of functions to make Risa/Asir a general purpose |
We need a lot of functions to make Risa/Asir a general purpose |
computer algebra system. In recent years we can obtain various high |
computer algebra system. In recent years we can make use of various high |
performance applications or libraries as free software. We wrapped |
performance applications or libraries as free software. We wrapped |
such software as OpenXM servers and we started to release a collection |
such software as OpenXM servers and we started to release a collection |
of such servers and cleints as OpenXM package in 1997. Risa/Asir is |
of such servers and clients as the OpenXM package in 1997. Risa/Asir |
now a main client in the package. |
is now a main client in the package. |
|
|
\item Environment for parallel and distributed computation |
\item Environment for parallel and distributed computation |
|
|
The origin of OpenXM is a protocol for doing parallel distributed |
The ancestor of OpenXM is a protocol designed for doing parallel |
compuatations by connecting multiple Risa/Asir. OpenXM is also |
distributed computations by connecting multiple Risa/Asir's over |
designed to provide an enviroment efficient parallel distributed |
TCP/IP. OpenXM is also designed to provide an environment for |
computation. Currently only client-server communication is possible, |
efficient parallel distributed computation. Currently only |
but we are preparing a specification OpenXM-RFC 102 allowing |
client-server communication is available, but we are preparing a |
client-client communication, which will enable us to execute |
specification OpenXM-RFC 102 allowing client-client communication, |
wider range of parallel algorithms efficiently. |
which will enable us to execute wider range of parallel algorithms |
|
requiring collective operations efficiently. |
\end{enumerate} |
\end{enumerate} |
|
|
\subsection{Groebner basis and the related computation} |
\subsection{Groebner basis and the related computation} |
Line 159 wider range of parallel algorithms efficiently. |
|
Line 158 wider range of parallel algorithms efficiently. |
|
Currently Risa/Asir can only deal with polynomial ring. Operations on |
Currently Risa/Asir can only deal with polynomial ring. Operations on |
modules over polynomial rings have not yet supported. However, both |
modules over polynomial rings have not yet supported. However, both |
commutative polynomial rings and Weyl algebra are supported and one |
commutative polynomial rings and Weyl algebra are supported and one |
can compute Groebner basis in both rings over the rationals, fields of |
can compute Groebner basis in both rings over {\bf Q}, fields of |
rational functions and finite fields. In the early stage of our |
rational functions and finite fields. In the early stage of our |
development, our effort was mainly devoted to improve the efficiency |
development, our effort was mainly devoted to improve the efficiency |
of computation over the rationals. Our main tool is modular |
of computation over {\bf Q}. Our main tool is modular |
computation. For Buchberger algorithm we adopted the trace lifting |
computation. For Buchberger algorithm we adopted the trace lifting |
algorithm by Traverso \cite{TRAV} and elaborated it by applying our |
algorithm by Traverso \cite{TRAV} and elaborated it by applying our |
theory on a correspondence between Groebner basis and its modular |
theory on a correspondence between Groebner basis and its modular |
image \cite{NOYO}. We also combine the trace lifting with |
image \cite{NOYO}. We also combine the trace lifting with |
homogenization to stabilize selection strategies, which enables us to |
homogenization to stabilize selection strategies, which enables us to |
compute several examples efficiently which is hard to compute without |
compute several examples efficiently which are hard to compute without |
such a combination. Our modular method can be applied to the change |
such a combination. Our modular method can be applied to the change |
of ordering algorithm and rational univariate representation. We also |
of ordering algorithm\cite{FGLM} and rational univariate |
made a test implementation of $F_4$ algorithm \cite{F4}. Later we will |
representation \cite{RUR}. We also made a test implementation of |
show timing data on Groebner basis computation. |
$F_4$ algorithm \cite{F4}. In the later section we will show timing |
|
data on Groebner basis computation. |
|
|
\subsection{Polynomial factorization} |
\subsection{Polynomial factorization} |
|
|
Here we briefly review functions on polynomial factorization. For |
Here we briefly review functions on polynomial factorization. For |
univariate factorization over {\bf Q}, the classical |
univariate factorization over {\bf Q}, the classical |
Berlekamp-Zassenhaus algorithm is implemented. Efficient algorithms |
Berlekamp-Zassenhaus algorithm is implemented. Efficient algorithms |
recently proposed have not yet implemented. For Univariate factorizer |
recently proposed have not yet implemented. For univariate |
over algebraic number fields, Trager's algorithm \cite{TRAGER} is |
factorization over algebraic number fields, Trager's algorithm |
implemented with some modifications. Its major applications are |
\cite{TRAGER} is implemented with some modifications. Its major |
splitting field and Galois group computation of polynomials over the |
applications are splitting field and Galois group computation of |
rationals. For such purpose a tower of simple extensions are suitable |
polynomials over {\bf Q} \cite{ANY}. For such purpose a tower of |
because factors represented over a simple extension often have huge |
simple extensions are suitable because factors represented over a |
coefficients \cite{ANY}. For univariate factorization over finite |
simple extension often have huge coefficients. For univariate |
fields, equal degree factorization + Cantor-Zassenhaus algorithm is |
factorization over finite fields, equal degree factorization and |
implemented. We can use various representation of finite fields: |
Cantor-Zassenhaus algorithm are implemented. We can use various |
$GF(p)$ with a machine integer prime $p$, $GF(p)$, $GF(p^n)$ with any |
representation of finite fields: $GF(p)$ with a machine integer prime |
odd prime $p$, $GF(2^n)$ with a bit representation of polynomials over |
$p$, $GF(p)$ and $GF(p^n)$ with any odd prime $p$, $GF(2^n)$ with a |
$GF(2)$ and $GF(p^n)$ with small $p^n$ represented by a primitive |
bit-array representation of polynomials over $GF(2)$ and $GF(p^n)$ |
root. For multivariate factorization over the rationals, the |
with small $p^n$ represented by a primitive root. For multivariate |
classical EZ(Extented Zassenhaus) type algorithm is implemented. |
factorization over {\bf Q}, the classical EZ(Extended |
|
Zassenhaus) type algorithm is implemented. |
|
|
\subsection{Other functions} |
\subsection{Other functions} |
By applying Groebner basis computation and polynomial factorization, |
By applying Groebner basis computation and polynomial factorization, |
we have implemented several higher level algorithms. A typical |
we have implemented several higher level algorithms. A typical |
application is primary ideal decomposition of polynomial ideals over |
application is primary ideal decomposition of polynomial ideals over |
{\bf Q}, which needs both functions. Shimoyama-Yokoyama algorithm |
{\bf Q}, which needs both functions. Shimoyama-Yokoyama algorithm |
\cite{SY} for primary decompsition is written in the user language. |
\cite{SY} for primary decomposition is written in the user language. |
Splitting field and Galois group computation are closely related and |
Splitting field and Galois group computation \cite{ANY} are closely |
are also important applications of polynomial factorization. Our |
related and are also important applications of polynomial |
implementation of Galois group computation algorithm \cite{ANY} |
factorization. |
requires splitting field computation, which is written in the |
|
user language. |
|
|
|
\section{Techniques for efficient Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}} |
\section{Techniques for efficient Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}} |
\label{gbtech} |
\label{gbtech} |
Line 214 Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, which are eas |
|
Line 213 Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, which are eas |
|
implemented but may not be well known. |
implemented but may not be well known. |
We use the following notations. |
We use the following notations. |
\begin{description} |
\begin{description} |
\item $\phi_p$ : the canonical projection from ${\bf Z}$ onto $GF(p)$ |
\item $<$ : a term order in the set of monomials. It is a total order such that |
\item $HT(f)$ : the head term of a polynomail with respect to a term order |
|
\item $HC(f)$ : the head coefficient of a polynomail with respect to a term order |
$\forall t, 1 \le t$ and $\forall s, t, u, s<t \Rightarrow us<ut$. |
|
\item $Id(F)$ : a polynomial ideal generated by a polynomial set $F$. |
|
\item $HT(f)$ : the head term of a polynomial with respect to a term order. |
|
\item $HC(f)$ : the head coefficient of a polynomial with respect to a term order. |
|
\item $T(f)$ : terms with non zero coefficients in $f$. |
|
\item $Spoly(f,g)$ : the S-polynomial of $\{f,g\}$ |
|
|
|
$Spoly(f,g) = T_{f,g}/HT(f)\cdot f/HC(f) -T_{f,g}/HT(g)\cdot g/HC(g)$, where |
|
$T_{f,g} = LCM(HT(f),HT(g))$. |
|
\item $\phi_p$ : the canonical projection from ${\bf Z}$ onto $GF(p)$. |
\end{description} |
\end{description} |
|
|
|
\subsection{Groebner basis computation and its improvements} |
|
|
|
A Groebner basis of an ideal $Id(F)$ can be computed by the Buchberger |
|
algorithm. The key oeration in the algorithm is the following |
|
division by a polynomial set. |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
|
while \= $\exists g \in G$, $\exists t \in T(f)$ such that $HT(g)|t$ do\\ |
|
\> $f \leftarrow f - t/HT(g) \cdot c/HC(g) \cdot g$, \quad |
|
where $c$ is the coeffcient of $t$ in $f$ |
|
\end{tabbing} |
|
This division terminates for any term order. |
|
With this division, we can show the most primitive version of the |
|
Buchberger algorithm. |
|
\begin{tabbing} |
|
Input : a finite polynomial set $F$\\ |
|
Output : a Groebner basis $G$ of $Id(F)$ with respect to a term order $<$\\ |
|
$G \leftarrow F$; \quad $D \leftarrow \{\{f,g\}| f, g \in G, f \neq g \}$\\ |
|
while \= $D \neq \emptyset$ do \\ |
|
\> $\{f,g\} \leftarrow$ an element of $D$; \quad |
|
$D \leftarrow D \setminus \{P\}$\\ |
|
\> $R \leftarrow$ a remainder of $Spoly(f,g)$ on division by $G$\\ |
|
\> if $R \neq 0$ then $D \leftarrow D \cup \{\{f,R\}| f \in G\}$; \quad |
|
$G \leftarrow G \cup \{R\}$\\ |
|
end do\\ |
|
return G |
|
\end{tabbing} |
|
Though this algorithm gives a Groebner basis of $Id(F)$, |
|
it is not practical at all. We need lots of techniques to make |
|
it practical. The following are major improvements: |
|
\begin{itemize} |
|
\item Useless pair detection |
|
|
|
We don't have to process all the pairs in $D$ and several useful |
|
criteria for detecting useless pairs were proposed. |
|
|
|
\item Selection strategy |
|
|
|
The selection of $\{f,g\}$ greatly affects the subsequent computation. |
|
The typical strategies are the normal startegy and the sugar strategy. |
|
The latter was proposed for efficient computation under a non |
|
degree-compatible order. |
|
|
|
\item Modular methods |
|
|
|
Even if we apply several criteria, it is difficult to detect all pairs |
|
whose S-polynomials are reduced to zero, and the cost to process them |
|
often occupies a major part in the whole computation. The trace algorithms |
|
were proposed to reduce such cost. This will be explained in more detail |
|
in Section \ref{gbhomo}. |
|
|
|
\item Change of ordering |
|
|
|
For elimination, we need a Groebner basis with respect to a non |
|
degree-compatible order, but it is often hard to compute it by |
|
the Buchberger algorithm. If the ideal is zero dimensional, we |
|
can apply a change of ordering algorithm for a Groebner basis |
|
with respect to any order and we can obtain a Groebner basis |
|
with respect to a desired order. |
|
|
|
\end{itemize} |
|
By implementing these techniques, one can obtain Groebner bases for |
|
wider range of inputs. Nevertheless there are still intractable |
|
problems with these classical tools. In the subsequent sections |
|
we show several methods for further improvements. |
|
|
\subsection{Combination of homogenization and trace lifting} |
\subsection{Combination of homogenization and trace lifting} |
|
\label{gbhomo} |
|
|
Traverso's trace lifting algorithm can be |
Traverso's trace lifting algorithm can be |
formulated in an abstract form as follows \cite{FPARA}. |
formulated in an abstract form as follows (c.f. \cite{FPARA}). |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
Input : a finite subset $F \subset {\bf Z}[X]$\\ |
Input : a finite subset $F \subset {\bf Z}[X]$\\ |
Output : a Groebner basis $G$ of $Id(F)$ with respect to a term order $<$\\ |
Output : a Groebner basis $G$ of $Id(F)$ with respect to a term order $<$\\ |
Line 235 such that $\phi_p(G)$ \\ |
|
Line 309 such that $\phi_p(G)$ \\ |
|
\>If $G$ passes the check return $G$\\ |
\>If $G$ passes the check return $G$\\ |
end do |
end do |
\end{tabbing} |
\end{tabbing} |
We can apply various methods for {\tt guess} part of the above |
We can apply various methods for {\it guess} part of the above |
algorithm. Originally we guess the candidate by replacing zero normal |
algorithm. In the original algorithm we guess the candidate by |
form checks over {\bf Q} with those over $GF(p)$ in the Buchberger |
replacing zero normal form checks over {\bf Q} with those over $GF(p)$ |
algorithm, which we call {\it tl\_guess}. In Asir one can specify |
in the Buchberger algorithm, which we call {\it tl\_guess}. In Asir |
another method {\it tl\_h\_guess\_dh}, which is a combination of |
one can specify another method {\it tl\_h\_guess\_dh}, which is a |
{\it tl\_guess} and homogenization. |
combination of {\it tl\_guess} and homogenization. |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
$tl\_h\_guess\_dh(F,p)$\\ |
$tl\_h\_guess\_dh(F,p)$\\ |
Input : $F\subset {\bf Z}[X]$, a prime $p$\\ |
Input : $F\subset {\bf Z}[X]$, a prime $p$\\ |
Line 254 such that $HT(h)|HT(g)$ \} |
|
Line 328 such that $HT(h)|HT(g)$ \} |
|
The input is homogenized to suppress intermediate coefficient swells |
The input is homogenized to suppress intermediate coefficient swells |
of intermediate basis elements. The number of zero normal forms may |
of intermediate basis elements. The number of zero normal forms may |
increase by the homogenization, but they are detected over |
increase by the homogenization, but they are detected over |
GF(p). Finally, by dehomogenizing the candidate we can expect that |
$GF(p)$. Finally, by dehomogenizing the candidate we can expect that |
lots of redundant elements can be removed. We will show later that this is |
lots of redundant elements can be removed. |
surely efficient for some input polynomial sets. |
|
|
|
\subsection{Minimal polynomial computation by modular method} |
\subsection{Minimal polynomial computation by modular method} |
|
|
Let $I$ be a zero-dimensional ideal in $R={\bf Q}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$. |
Let $I$ be a zero-dimensional ideal in $R={\bf Q}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$. |
Then the minimal polynomial $m(x_i)$ of a variable $x_i$ in $R/I$ can |
Then the minimal polynomial $m(x_i)$ of a variable $x_i$ in $R/I$ can |
be computed by a partial FGLM \cite{FGLM}, but it often takes long |
be computed by a partial FGLM \cite{FGLM}, but it often takes long |
Line 267 case we can apply a simple modular method to compute t |
|
Line 341 case we can apply a simple modular method to compute t |
|
polynomial. |
polynomial. |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
Input : a Groebner basis $G$ of $I$, a variable $x_i$\\ |
Input : a Groebner basis $G$ of $I$, a variable $x_i$\\ |
Output : the minimal polynomial of $x$ in $R/I$\\ |
Output : the minimal polynomial of $x_i$ in $R/I$\\ |
do \= \\ |
do \= \\ |
\> $p \leftarrow$ a new prime such that $p \not{|} HC(g)$ for all $g \in G$\\ |
\> $p \leftarrow$ a new prime such that $p \not{|} HC(g)$ for all $g \in G$\\ |
\> $m_p \leftarrow$ the minimal polynomial of $x_i$ in $GF(p)[x_1,\ldots,x_n]/Id(\phi_p(G))$\\ |
\> $m_p \leftarrow$ the minimal polynomial of $x_i$ in $GF(p)[x_1,\ldots,x_n]/Id(\phi_p(G))$\\ |
Line 279 In this algorithm, $m_p$ can be obtained by a partial |
|
Line 353 In this algorithm, $m_p$ can be obtained by a partial |
|
$GF(p)$ because $\phi_p(G)$ is a Groebner basis. Once we know the |
$GF(p)$ because $\phi_p(G)$ is a Groebner basis. Once we know the |
candidate of $\deg(m(x_i))$, $m(x_i)$ can be determined by solving a |
candidate of $\deg(m(x_i))$, $m(x_i)$ can be determined by solving a |
system of linear equations via the method of indeterminate |
system of linear equations via the method of indeterminate |
coefficient. Arguments on \cite{NOYO} ensures that $m(x_i)$ is what we |
coefficient, and it can be solved efficiently by $p$-adic method. |
want if it exists. Note that the full FGLM can also be computed by the |
Arguments on \cite{NOYO} ensures that $m(x_i)$ is what we want if it |
same method. |
exists. Note that the full FGLM can also be computed by the same |
|
method. |
|
|
\subsection{Integer contents reduction} |
\subsection{Integer contents reduction} |
|
\label{gbcont} |
|
|
In some cases the cost to remove integer contents during nomal form |
In some cases the cost to remove integer contents during normal form |
computations is dominant. We can remove the content of an integral |
computations is dominant. We can remove the content of an integral |
polynomial $f$ efficiently by the following method \cite{REPL}. |
polynomial $f$ efficiently by the following method \cite{REPL}. |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
Input : an integral polynomial $f$\\ |
Input : an integral polynomial $f$\\ |
Output : a pair $(\cont(f),f/\cont(f))$\\ |
Output : a pair $(\cont(f),f/\cont(f))$\\ |
$g_0 \leftarrow$ an estimate of $\cont(f)$ such that $\cont(f)|g_0$\\ |
$g_0 \leftarrow$ an estimate of $\cont(f)$ such that $\cont(f)|g_0$\\ |
Write $f$ as $f = g_0q+r$ by division with remainder for each coefficient\\ |
Write $f$ as $f = g_0q+r$ by division with remainder by $g_0$ for each coefficient\\ |
If $r = 0$ then return $(g_0,q)$\\ |
If $r = 0$ then return $(g_0,q)$\\ |
else return $(g,g_0/g \cdot q + r/g)$, where $g = \GCD(g_0,\cont(r))$ |
else return $(g,g_0/g \cdot q + r/g)$, where $g = \GCD(g_0,\cont(r))$ |
\end{tabbing} |
\end{tabbing} |
By serataing the set of coefficients of $f$ into two subsets and by |
By separating the set of coefficients of $f$ into two subsets and by |
computing GCD of sums in the elements in the subsets we can estimate |
computing GCD of sums of the elements in each subset we can estimate |
$g_0$ with high accuracy. Then other components are easily computed. |
$g_0$ with high accuracy. Then other components are easily computed. |
|
|
%\subsection{Demand loading of reducers} |
%\subsection{Demand loading of reducers} |
%An execution of the Buchberer algorithm may produce vary large number |
%An execution of the Buchberger algorithm may produce vary large number |
%of intermediate basis elements. In Asir, we can specify that such |
%of intermediate basis elements. In Asir, we can specify that such |
%basis elements should be put on disk to enlarge free memory space. |
%basis elements should be put on disk to enlarge free memory space. |
%This does not reduce the efficiency so much because all basis elements |
%This does not reduce the efficiency so much because all basis elements |
Line 311 $g_0$ with high accuracy. Then other components are ea |
|
Line 387 $g_0$ with high accuracy. Then other components are ea |
|
|
|
\section{Risa/Asir performance} |
\section{Risa/Asir performance} |
|
|
We show timing data on Risa/Asir for polynomial factorization |
We show timing data on Risa/Asir for Groebner basis computation |
and Groebner basis computation. The measurements were made on |
and polynomial factorization. The measurements were made on |
a PC with PentiumIII 1GHz and 1Gbyte of main memory. Timings |
a PC with PentiumIII 1GHz and 1Gbyte of main memory. Timings |
are given in seconds. In the tables `---' means it was not |
are given in seconds. In the tables `---' means it was not |
measured. |
measured. |
|
|
\subsection{Groebner basis computation} |
\subsection{Groebner basis computation} |
|
|
Table \ref{gbmod} and Table \ref{gbq} shows timing data for Groebner |
Table \ref{gbmod} and Table \ref{gbq} show timing data for Groebner |
basis compuation over $GF(32003)$ and over {\bf Q} respectively. |
basis computation over $GF(32003)$ and over {\bf Q} respectively. |
$C_n$ is the cyclic $n$ system and $K_n$ is the Katsura $n$ system, |
$C_n$ is the cyclic $n$ system and $K_n$ is the Katsura $n$ system, |
both are famous bench mark problems. We also measured the timing for |
both are famous bench mark problems \cite{BENCH}. We also measured |
$McKay$ system over {\bf Q} \cite{REPL}. the term order is graded |
the timing for $McKay$ system over {\bf Q} \cite{REPL}. the term |
reverse lexicographic order. In the both tables, the first three rows |
order is graded reverse lexicographic order. In the both tables, the |
are timings for the Buchberger algorithm, and the last two rows are |
first three rows are timings for the Buchberger algorithm, and the |
timings for $F_4$ algorithm. As to the Buchberger algorithm over |
last two rows are timings for $F_4$ algorithm. As to the Buchberger |
$GF(32003)$, Singular\cite{SINGULAR} shows the best performance among |
algorithm over $GF(32003)$, Singular\cite{SINGULAR} shows the best |
the three systems. $F_4$ implementation in Risa/Asir is faster than |
performance among the three systems. $F_4$ implementation in Risa/Asir |
the Buchberger algorithm implementation in Singluar, but it is still |
is faster than the Buchberger algorithm implementation in Singular, |
several times slower than $F_4$ implemenataion in FGb \cite{FGB}. In |
but it is still several times slower than $F_4$ implementation in FGb |
Table \ref{gbq}, $C_7$ and $McKay$ can be computed by the Buchberger |
\cite{FGB}. In Table \ref{gbq}, Risa/Asir computed $C_7$ and $McKay$ |
algorithm with the methods described in Section \ref{gbtech}. It is |
by the Buchberger algorithm with the methods described in Section |
obvious that $F_4$ implementation in Risa/Asir over {\bf Q} is too |
\ref{gbhomo} and \ref{gbcont}. It is obvious that $F_4$ |
immature. Nevertheless the timing of $McKay$ is greatly reduced. |
implementation in Risa/Asir over {\bf Q} is too immature. Nevertheless |
Why is $F_4$ efficient in this case? The answer is in the right |
the timing of $McKay$ is greatly reduced. Fig. \ref{f4vsbuch} |
half of Fig. \ref{f4vsbuch}. During processing S-polynomials of degree |
explains why $F_4$ is efficient in this case. The figure shows that |
16, the Buchberger algorithm produces intermediate polynomials with |
the Buchberger algorithm produces normal forms with huge coefficients |
huge coefficients, but if we compute normal forms of these polynomials |
for S-polynomials after the 250-th one, which are the computations in |
by using all subsequently generated basis elements, then their |
degree 16. However, we know that the reduced basis elements have much |
coefficients will be reduced after removing contents. As $F_4$ |
smaller coefficients after removing contents. As $F_4$ algorithm |
algorithm automatically produces the reduced basis elements, the |
automatically produces the reduced ones, the degree 16 computation is |
degree 16 computation is quite easy in $F_4$. |
quite easy in $F_4$. |
|
|
|
|
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{center} |
\begin{center} |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
Line 362 FGb(estimated) & 0.9 & 23 & 0.1 & 0.8 & 6 & 51 & 366 \ |
|
Line 437 FGb(estimated) & 0.9 & 23 & 0.1 & 0.8 & 6 & 51 & 366 \ |
|
|
|
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{center} |
\begin{center} |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
& $C_7$ & $Homog. C_7$ & $K_7$ & $K_8$ & $McKay$ \\ \hline |
& $C_7$ & $Homog. C_7$ & $C_8$ & $K_7$ & $K_8$ & $McKay$ \\ \hline |
Asir $Buchberger$ & 389 & 594 & 29 & 299 & 34950 \\ \hline |
Asir $Buchberger$ & 389 & 594 & 54000 & 29 & 299 & 34950 \\ \hline |
Singular & --- & 15247 & 7.6 & 79 & $>$ 20h \\ \hline |
Singular & --- & 15247 & --- & 7.6 & 79 & $>$ 20h \\ \hline |
CoCoA 4 & --- & 13227 & 57 & 709 & --- \\ \hline\hline |
CoCoA 4 & --- & 13227 & --- & 57 & 709 & --- \\ \hline\hline |
Asir $F_4$ & 989 & 456 & 90 & 991 & 4939 \\ \hline |
Asir $F_4$ & 989 & 456 & --- & 90 & 991 & 4939 \\ \hline |
FGb(estimated) & 8 &11 & 0.6 & 5 & 10 \\ \hline |
FGb(estimated) & 8 &11 & 288 & 0.6 & 5 & 10 \\ \hline |
\end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
\end{center} |
\end{center} |
\caption{Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}} |
\caption{Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}} |
Line 378 FGb(estimated) & 8 &11 & 0.6 & 5 & 10 \\ \hline |
|
Line 453 FGb(estimated) & 8 &11 & 0.6 & 5 & 10 \\ \hline |
|
\begin{figure}[hbtp] |
\begin{figure}[hbtp] |
\begin{center} |
\begin{center} |
\epsfxsize=12cm |
\epsfxsize=12cm |
\epsffile{../compalg/ps/blenall.ps} |
%\epsffile{../compalg/ps/blenall.ps} |
|
\epsffile{blen.ps} |
\end{center} |
\end{center} |
\caption{Maximal coefficient bit length of intermediate bases} |
\caption{Maximal coefficient bit length of intermediate bases} |
\label{f4vsbuch} |
\label{f4vsbuch} |
\end{figure} |
\end{figure} |
|
|
\subsection{Polynomial factorization} |
Table \ref{minipoly} shows timing data for the minimal polynomial |
|
computation over {\bf Q}. Singular provides a function {\tt finduni} |
Table \ref{unifac} shows timing data for univariate factorization over |
for computing the minimal polynomial in each variable in ${\bf |
{\bf Q}. $N_{i,j}$ is an irreducible polynomial which are hard to |
Q}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]/I$ for zero dimensional ideal $I$. The modular |
factor by the classical algorithm. $N_{i,j}$ is a norm of a polynomial |
method used in Asir is efficient when the resulting minimal |
and $\deg(N_i) = i$ with $j$ modular factors. Risa/Asir is |
polynomials have large coefficients and we can verify the fact from Table |
disadvantageous in factoring polynomials of this type because the |
\ref{minipoly}. |
algorithm used in Risa/Asir has exponential complexity. In contrast, |
|
CoCoA 4\cite{COCOA} and NTL-5.2\cite{NTL} show nice performances |
|
because they implement recently developed algorithms. |
|
|
|
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{center} |
\begin{center} |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|} \hline |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
& $N_{105,23}$ & $N_{120,20}$ & $N_{168,24}$ & $N_{210,54}$ \\ \hline |
& $C_6$ & $C_7$ & $K_6$ & $K_7$ & $K_8$ \\ \hline |
Asir & 0.86 & 59 & 840 & hard \\ \hline |
Singular & 0.9 & 846 & 307 & 60880 & --- \\ \hline |
Asir NormFactor & 1.6 & 2.2& 6.1& hard \\ \hline |
Asir & 1.5 & 182 & 12 & 164 & 3420 \\ \hline |
%Singular& hard? & hard?& hard? & hard? \\ \hline |
|
CoCoA 4 & 0.2 & 7.1 & 16 & 0.5 \\ \hline\hline |
|
NTL-5.2 & 0.16 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 0.4 \\ \hline |
|
\end{tabular} |
\end{tabular} |
\end{center} |
\end{center} |
\caption{Univariate factorization over {\bf Q}} |
\caption{Minimal polynomial computation} |
\label{unifac} |
\label{minipoly} |
\end{table} |
\end{table} |
|
|
|
\subsection{Polynomial factorization} |
|
|
|
%Table \ref{unifac} shows timing data for univariate factorization over |
|
%{\bf Q}. $N_{i,j}$ is an irreducible polynomial which are hard to |
|
%factor by the classical algorithm. $N_{i,j}$ is a norm of a polynomial |
|
%and $\deg(N_i) = i$ with $j$ modular factors. Risa/Asir is |
|
%disadvantageous in factoring polynomials of this type because the |
|
%algorithm used in Risa/Asir has exponential complexity. In contrast, |
|
%CoCoA 4\cite{COCOA} and NTL-5.2\cite{NTL} show nice performances |
|
%because they implement recently developed algorithms. |
|
% |
|
%\begin{table}[hbtp] |
|
%\begin{center} |
|
%\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|} \hline |
|
% & $N_{105,23}$ & $N_{120,20}$ & $N_{168,24}$ & $N_{210,54}$ \\ \hline |
|
%Asir & 0.86 & 59 & 840 & hard \\ \hline |
|
%Asir NormFactor & 1.6 & 2.2& 6.1& hard \\ \hline |
|
%%Singular& hard? & hard?& hard? & hard? \\ \hline |
|
%CoCoA 4 & 0.2 & 7.1 & 16 & 0.5 \\ \hline\hline |
|
%NTL-5.2 & 0.16 & 0.9 & 1.4 & 0.4 \\ \hline |
|
%\end{tabular} |
|
%\end{center} |
|
%\caption{Univariate factorization over {\bf Q}} |
|
%\label{unifac} |
|
%\end{table} |
|
|
Table \ref{multifac} shows timing data for multivariate |
Table \ref{multifac} shows timing data for multivariate |
factorization over {\bf Q}. |
factorization over {\bf Q}. |
$W_{i,j,k}$ is a product of three multivariate polynomials |
$W_{i,j,k}$ is a product of three multivariate polynomials |
Line 418 $Wang[i]$, $Wang[j]$, $Wang[k]$ given in a data file |
|
Line 513 $Wang[i]$, $Wang[j]$, $Wang[k]$ given in a data file |
|
in Risa/Asir source tree and located in {\tt asir2000/lib}. |
in Risa/Asir source tree and located in {\tt asir2000/lib}. |
For these examples Risa/Asir shows reasonable performance |
For these examples Risa/Asir shows reasonable performance |
compared with other famous systems. |
compared with other famous systems. |
|
|
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{center} |
\begin{center} |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
\begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|} \hline |
Line 435 Maple 7& 0.5 & 18 & 967 & 48 & 1.3 \\ \hline |
|
Line 529 Maple 7& 0.5 & 18 & 967 & 48 & 1.3 \\ \hline |
|
\caption{Multivariate factorization over {\bf Q}} |
\caption{Multivariate factorization over {\bf Q}} |
\label{multifac} |
\label{multifac} |
\end{table} |
\end{table} |
|
As to univariate factorization over {\bf Q}, |
|
the univariate factorizer implements only classical |
|
algorithms and its behavior is what one expects, |
|
that is, it shows average performance in cases |
|
where there are little extraneous factors, but |
|
shows poor performance for hard to factor polynomials with |
|
many extraneous factors. |
|
|
\section{OpenXM and Risa/Asir OpenXM interfaces} |
\section{OpenXM and Risa/Asir OpenXM interfaces} |
|
|
\subsection{OpenXM overview} |
\subsection{OpenXM overview} |
|
|
OpenXM stands for Open message eXchange protocol for Mathematics. |
OpenXM stands for Open message eXchange protocol for Mathematics. |
Form the viewpoint of protocol design, it is a child of OpenMath |
From the viewpoint of protocol design, it can be regarded as a child |
\cite{OPENMATH}. However our approch is somewhat different. Our main |
of OpenMath \cite{OPENMATH}. However our approach is somewhat |
purpose is to provide an environment for integrating {\it existing} |
different. Our main purpose is to provide an environment for |
mathematical software systems. OpenXM RFC-100 \cite{RFC100} defines a |
integrating {\it existing} mathematical software systems. OpenXM |
client-server architecture. Under this specification, a client |
RFC-100 \cite{RFC100} defines a client-server architecture. Under |
invokes an OpenXM (OX) server. The client can send OpenXM (OX) |
this specification, a client invokes an OpenXM ({\it OX}) server. The |
messages to the server. OX messages consist of {\it data} and {\it |
client can send OpenXM ({\it OX}) messages to the server. OX messages |
command}. Data is encoded according to the common mathematical object |
consist of {\it data} and {\it command}. Data is encoded according to |
(CMO) format which defines serialized representation of mathematical |
the common mathematical object ({\it CMO}) format which defines |
objects. An OX server is a stackmachine. If data is sent as an OX |
serialized representation of mathematical objects. An OX server is a |
message, the server pushes the data onto its stack. There is a common |
stackmachine. If data is sent as an OX message, the server pushes the |
set of stackmachine commands and all OX server understands its subset. |
data onto its stack. There is a common set of stackmachine commands |
The command set includes commands for manipulating the stack and |
and each OX server understands its subset. The command set includes |
requests for execution of a procedure. In addition, a server may |
stack manipulating commands and requests for execution of a procedure. |
accept its own command sequences if the server wraps some interactive |
In addition, a server may accept its own command sequences if the |
software. That is the server may be a hybrid server. |
server wraps some interactive software. That is the server may be a |
|
hybrid server. |
|
|
OpenXM RFC-100 also defines methods for session management. In particular |
OpenXM RFC-100 also defines methods for session management. In particular |
the method to reset a server is carefully designed and it provides |
the method to reset a server is carefully designed and it provides |
|
|
\subsection{OpenXM client interface of {\tt asir}} |
\subsection{OpenXM client interface of {\tt asir}} |
|
|
Risa/Asir is a main client in OpenXM package. The application {\tt |
Risa/Asir is a main client in OpenXM package. The application {\tt |
asir} can access to OpenXM servers via several builtin interface |
asir} can access to OpenXM servers via several built-in interface |
functions. and various inferfaces to existing OpenXM servers are |
functions. and various interfaces to existing OpenXM servers are |
prepared as user defined functions written in Asir language. We show |
prepared as user defined functions written in Asir language. |
a typical OpenXM session. |
We show a typical OpenXM session. |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
\begin{verbatim} |
[1] P = ox_launch(); /* invoke an OpenXM asir server */ |
[1] P = ox_launch(); /* invoke an OpenXM asir server */ |
Line 483 a typical OpenXM session. |
|
Line 585 a typical OpenXM session. |
|
[[1,1],[x^4+y*x^3+y^2*x^2+y^3*x+y^4,1], |
[[1,1],[x^4+y*x^3+y^2*x^2+y^3*x+y^4,1], |
[x^4-y*x^3+y^2*x^2-y^3*x+y^4,1],[x-y,1],[x+y,1]] |
[x^4-y*x^3+y^2*x^2-y^3*x+y^4,1],[x-y,1],[x+y,1]] |
[5] ox_cmo_rpc(P,"fctr,",x^10000-2^10000*y^10000); |
[5] ox_cmo_rpc(P,"fctr,",x^10000-2^10000*y^10000); |
/* call factorizer; an utility function */ |
/* call factorizer; a utility function */ |
0 |
0 |
[6] ox_reset(P); /* reset the computation in the server */ |
[6] ox_reset(P); /* reset the computation in the server */ |
1 |
1 |
Line 495 a typical OpenXM session. |
|
Line 597 a typical OpenXM session. |
|
|
|
An application {\tt ox\_asir} is a wrapper of {\tt asir} and provides |
An application {\tt ox\_asir} is a wrapper of {\tt asir} and provides |
all the functions of {\tt asir} to OpenXM clients. It completely |
all the functions of {\tt asir} to OpenXM clients. It completely |
implements the OpenXM reset protocol and also provides remote |
implements the OpenXM reset protocol and also allows remote |
debugging of user programs running on the server. We show a program |
debugging of user programs running on the server. As an example we |
for checking whether a polynomial set is a Groebner basis or not. A |
show a program for checking whether a polynomial set is a Groebner |
client executes {\tt gbcheck()} and servers execute {\tt |
basis or not. A client executes {\tt gbcheck()} and servers execute |
sp\_nf\_for\_gbcheck()} which is a simple normal form computation of a |
{\tt sp\_nf\_for\_gbcheck()} which is a simple normal form computation |
S-polynomial. First of all the client collects all critical pairs |
of an S-polynomial. First of all the client collects all critical pairs |
necessary for the check. Then the client requests normal form |
necessary for the check. Then the client requests normal form |
computations to idling servers. If there are no idling servers the |
computations to idling servers. If there are no idling servers the |
clients waits for some servers to return results by {\tt |
clients waits for some servers to return results by {\tt |
ox\_select()}, which is a wrapper of UNIX {\tt select()}. If we have |
ox\_select()}, which is a wrapper of UNIX {\tt select()}. If we have |
large number of critcal pairs to be processed, we can expect |
large number of critical pairs to be processed, we can expect good |
good load balancing by {\tt ox\_select()}. |
load balancing by {\tt ox\_select()}. |
|
|
\begin{verbatim} |
\begin{verbatim} |
def gbcheck(B,V,O,Procs) { |
def gbcheck(B,V,O,Procs) { |
Line 544 def gbcheck(B,V,O,Procs) { |
|
Line 646 def gbcheck(B,V,O,Procs) { |
|
|
|
\subsection{Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a}} |
\subsection{Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a}} |
|
|
Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a} includes functions simulating the |
Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a} contains functions simulating the |
stack machine commands supported in {\tt ox\_asir}. By linking {\tt |
stack machine commands supported in {\tt ox\_asir}. By linking {\tt |
libasir.a} an application can use the same functions as in {\tt |
libasir.a} an application can use the same functions as in {\tt |
ox\_asir} without accessing to {\tt ox\_asir} via TCP/IP. |
ox\_asir} without accessing to {\tt ox\_asir} via TCP/IP. There is |
|
also a stack, which can be manipulated by the library functions. In |
|
order to make full use of this interface, one has to prepare |
|
conversion functions between CMO and the data structures proper to the |
|
application itself. A function {\tt asir\_ox\_pop\_string()} is |
|
provided to convert CMO to a human readable form, which may be |
|
sufficient for a simple use of this interface. |
|
|
\section{Concluding remarks} |
\section{Concluding remarks} |
We have shown the current status of Risa/Asir and its OpenXM |
We have shown the current status of Risa/Asir and its OpenXM |
interfaces. As a result of our policy of development, it is true that |
interfaces. As a result of our policy of development, it is true that |
Risa/Asir does not have abundant functions. However it is a completely |
Risa/Asir does not have abundant functions. However it is a completely |
open system and its total performance is not bad. As OpenXM interface |
open system and its total performance is not bad. Especially on |
specification is completely documented, we can add another function to |
Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, many techniques for improving |
Risa/Asir by wrapping an existing software system as an OX server and |
practical performances have been implemented. As the OpenXM interface |
vice versa. User program debugger can be used both for local and |
specification is completely documented, we can easily add another |
remote debugging. By combining the debugger and the function to reset |
function to Risa/Asir by wrapping an existing software system as an OX |
servers, one will be able to enjoy parallel and distributed |
server, and other clients can call functions in Risa/Asir by |
computation. |
implementing the OpenXM client interface. With the remote debugging |
|
and the function to reset servers, one will be able to enjoy parallel |
|
and distributed computation with OpenXM facilities. |
% |
% |
\begin{thebibliography}{7} |
\begin{thebibliography}{7} |
% |
% |
Line 612 OpenXM committers (2000-2001) |
|
Line 722 OpenXM committers (2000-2001) |
|
OpenXM package. |
OpenXM package. |
{\tt http://www.openxm.org}. |
{\tt http://www.openxm.org}. |
|
|
|
\bibitem{RUR} |
|
Rouillier, R. (1996) |
|
R\'esolution des syst\`emes z\'ero-dimensionnels. |
|
Doctoral Thesis(1996), University of Rennes I, France. |
|
|
\bibitem{SY} |
\bibitem{SY} |
Shimoyama, T., Yokoyama, K. (1996) |
Shimoyama, T., Yokoyama, K. (1996) |
Localization and Primary Decomposition of Polynomial Ideals. |
Localization and Primary Decomposition of Polynomial Ideals. |
Line 627 Traverso, C. (1988) |
|
Line 742 Traverso, C. (1988) |
|
Groebner trace algorithms. |
Groebner trace algorithms. |
LNCS {\bf 358} (Proceedings of ISSAC'88), Springer-Verlag, 125--138. |
LNCS {\bf 358} (Proceedings of ISSAC'88), Springer-Verlag, 125--138. |
|
|
|
\bibitem{BENCH} |
|
{\tt http://www.math.uic.edu/\~\,jan/demo.html}. |
|
|
\bibitem{COCOA} |
\bibitem{COCOA} |
{\tt http://cocoa.dima.unige.it/}. |
{\tt http://cocoa.dima.unige.it/}. |
|
|
\bibitem{FGB} |
\bibitem{FGB} |
{\tt http://www-calfor.lip6.fr/\~\,jcf/}. |
{\tt http://www-calfor.lip6.fr/\~\,jcf/}. |
|
|
\bibitem{NTL} |
%\bibitem{NTL} |
{\tt http://www.shoup.net/}. |
%{\tt http://www.shoup.net/}. |
|
|
\bibitem{OPENMATH} |
\bibitem{OPENMATH} |
{\tt http://www.openmath.org/}. |
{\tt http://www.openmath.org/}. |