version 1.6, 2001/11/28 09:05:57 |
version 1.7, 2001/11/30 02:02:09 |
|
|
% $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/Papers/dag-noro-proc.tex,v 1.5 2001/11/28 08:46:54 noro Exp $ |
% $OpenXM: OpenXM/doc/Papers/dag-noro-proc.tex,v 1.6 2001/11/28 09:05:57 noro Exp $ |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
% This is a sample input file for your contribution to a multi- |
% This is a sample input file for your contribution to a multi- |
% author book to be published by Springer Verlag. |
% author book to be published by Springer Verlag. |
|
|
% allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long |
% allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long |
% to fit in the running head |
% to fit in the running head |
% |
% |
\author{Masayuki Noro\inst{1}} |
\author{Masayuki Noro} |
% |
% |
%\authorrunning{Masayuki Noro} |
%\authorrunning{Masayuki Noro} |
% if there are more than two authors, |
% if there are more than two authors, |
|
|
\maketitle % typesets the title of the contribution |
\maketitle % typesets the title of the contribution |
|
|
\begin{abstract} |
\begin{abstract} |
OpenXM \cite{OPENXM} is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical |
Risa/Asir is software for polynomial computation. It has been |
|
developed for testing experimental polynomial algorithms, and now it |
|
acts also as a main component in the OpenXM package \cite{OPENXM}. |
|
OpenXM is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical |
data. It defines a client-server architecture for parallel and |
data. It defines a client-server architecture for parallel and |
distributed computation. Risa/Asir is software for polynomial |
distributed computation. In this article we present an overview of |
computation. It has been developed for testing new algorithms, and now |
Risa/Asir and review several techniques for improving performances of |
it acts as both a client and a server in the OpenXM package. In this |
Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}. We also show Risa/Asir's |
article we present an overview of Risa/Asir and review several |
OpenXM interfaces and their usages. |
techniques for improving performances of Groebner basis computation. |
|
We also show Risa/Asir's OpenXM interfaces and their usages by |
|
examples. |
|
\end{abstract} |
\end{abstract} |
|
|
\section{A computer algebra system Risa/Asir} |
\section{A computer algebra system Risa/Asir} |
Line 111 decomposition or Galois group computation are built on |
|
Line 111 decomposition or Galois group computation are built on |
|
user language called Asir language. Asir language can be regarded as C |
user language called Asir language. Asir language can be regarded as C |
language without type declaration of variables, with list processing, |
language without type declaration of variables, with list processing, |
and with automatic garbage collection. A built-in {\tt gdb}-like user |
and with automatic garbage collection. A built-in {\tt gdb}-like user |
language debugger is available. It is open source and the source code |
language debugger is available. Risa/Asir is open source and the |
and binaries are available via {\tt ftp} or {\tt CVS}. Risa/Asir is |
source code and binaries are available via {\tt ftp} or {\tt CVS}. |
not only a standalone computer algebra system but also a main |
Risa/Asir is not only a standalone computer algebra system but also a |
component in OpenXM package \cite{OPENXM}, which is a collection of |
main component in OpenXM package \cite{OPENXM}, which is a collection |
various software compliant to OpenXM protocol specification. OpenXM |
of various software compliant to OpenXM protocol specification. |
is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical data and Risa/Asir |
OpenXM is an infrastructure for exchanging mathematical data and |
has three kind of OpenXM interfaces : client interfaces, an OpenXM |
Risa/Asir has three kinds of OpenXM interfaces : as a client, as a |
server, and a subroutine library. Our goals of developing Risa/Asir |
server, and as a subroutine library. Our goals of developing Risa/Asir |
are as follows: |
are as follows: |
|
|
\begin{enumerate} |
\begin{enumerate} |
\item Providing a platform for testing new algorithms |
\item Providing a platform for testing new algorithms |
|
|
Risa/Asir has been a platform for testing experimental algorithms in |
Risa/Asir has been a platform for testing experimental algorithms in |
polynomial factorization, computation related to Groebner basis, |
polynomial factorization, Groebner basis computation, |
cryptography and quantifier elimination. As to Groebner basis, we have |
cryptography and quantifier elimination. As to Groebner basis, we have |
been mainly interested in problems over {\bf Q} and we tried applying |
been mainly interested in problems over {\bf Q} and we tried applying |
various modular techniques to overcome difficulties caused by huge |
various modular techniques to overcome difficulties caused by huge |
intermediate coefficients. We have had several results and they have |
intermediate coefficients. We have had several results and they have |
been implemented in Risa/Asir. |
been implemented in Risa/Asir with other known methods. |
|
|
\item General purpose open system |
\item General purpose open system |
|
|
We need a lot of functions to make Risa/Asir a general purpose |
We need a lot of functions to make Risa/Asir a general purpose |
computer algebra system. In recent years we can obtain various high |
computer algebra system. In recent years we can make use of various high |
performance applications or libraries as free software. We wrapped |
performance applications or libraries as free software. We wrapped |
such software as OpenXM servers and we started to release a collection |
such software as OpenXM servers and we started to release a collection |
of such servers and clients as the OpenXM package in 1997. Risa/Asir |
of such servers and clients as the OpenXM package in 1997. Risa/Asir |
Line 143 is now a main client in the package. |
|
Line 143 is now a main client in the package. |
|
|
|
\item Environment for parallel and distributed computation |
\item Environment for parallel and distributed computation |
|
|
The origin of OpenXM is a protocol for doing parallel distributed |
The ancestor of OpenXM is a protocol designed for doing parallel |
computations by connecting multiple Risa/Asir's over TCP/IP. OpenXM is |
distributed computations by connecting multiple Risa/Asir's over |
also designed to provide an environment efficient parallel distributed |
TCP/IP. OpenXM is also designed to provide an environment for |
computation. Currently only client-server communication is available, |
efficient parallel distributed computation. Currently only |
but we are preparing a specification OpenXM-RFC 102 allowing |
client-server communication is available, but we are preparing a |
client-client communication, which will enable us to execute wider |
specification OpenXM-RFC 102 allowing client-client communication, |
range of parallel algorithms efficiently. |
which will enable us to execute wider range of parallel algorithms |
|
requiring collective operations efficiently. |
\end{enumerate} |
\end{enumerate} |
|
|
\subsection{Groebner basis and the related computation} |
\subsection{Groebner basis and the related computation} |
Line 157 range of parallel algorithms efficiently. |
|
Line 158 range of parallel algorithms efficiently. |
|
Currently Risa/Asir can only deal with polynomial ring. Operations on |
Currently Risa/Asir can only deal with polynomial ring. Operations on |
modules over polynomial rings have not yet supported. However, both |
modules over polynomial rings have not yet supported. However, both |
commutative polynomial rings and Weyl algebra are supported and one |
commutative polynomial rings and Weyl algebra are supported and one |
can compute Groebner basis in both rings over the rationals, fields of |
can compute Groebner basis in both rings over {\bf Q}, fields of |
rational functions and finite fields. In the early stage of our |
rational functions and finite fields. In the early stage of our |
development, our effort was mainly devoted to improve the efficiency |
development, our effort was mainly devoted to improve the efficiency |
of computation over the rationals. Our main tool is modular |
of computation over {\bf Q}. Our main tool is modular |
computation. For Buchberger algorithm we adopted the trace lifting |
computation. For Buchberger algorithm we adopted the trace lifting |
algorithm by Traverso \cite{TRAV} and elaborated it by applying our |
algorithm by Traverso \cite{TRAV} and elaborated it by applying our |
theory on a correspondence between Groebner basis and its modular |
theory on a correspondence between Groebner basis and its modular |
image \cite{NOYO}. We also combine the trace lifting with |
image \cite{NOYO}. We also combine the trace lifting with |
homogenization to stabilize selection strategies, which enables us to |
homogenization to stabilize selection strategies, which enables us to |
compute several examples efficiently which is hard to compute without |
compute several examples efficiently which are hard to compute without |
such a combination. Our modular method can be applied to the change |
such a combination. Our modular method can be applied to the change |
of ordering algorithm and rational univariate representation. We also |
of ordering algorithm\cite{FGLM} and rational univariate |
made a test implementation of $F_4$ algorithm \cite{F4}. Later we will |
representation \cite{RUR}. We also made a test implementation of |
show timing data on Groebner basis computation. |
$F_4$ algorithm \cite{F4}. In the later section we will show timing |
|
data on Groebner basis computation. |
|
|
\subsection{Polynomial factorization} |
\subsection{Polynomial factorization} |
|
|
Here we briefly review functions on polynomial factorization. For |
Here we briefly review functions on polynomial factorization. For |
univariate factorization over {\bf Q}, the classical |
univariate factorization over {\bf Q}, the classical |
Berlekamp-Zassenhaus algorithm is implemented. Efficient algorithms |
Berlekamp-Zassenhaus algorithm is implemented. Efficient algorithms |
recently proposed have not yet implemented. For Univariate factorizer |
recently proposed have not yet implemented. For univariate |
over algebraic number fields, Trager's algorithm \cite{TRAGER} is |
factorization over algebraic number fields, Trager's algorithm |
implemented with some modifications. Its major applications are |
\cite{TRAGER} is implemented with some modifications. Its major |
splitting field and Galois group computation of polynomials over the |
applications are splitting field and Galois group computation of |
rationals \cite{ANY}. For such purpose a tower of simple extensions |
polynomials over {\bf Q} \cite{ANY}. For such purpose a tower of |
are suitable because factors represented over a simple extension often |
simple extensions are suitable because factors represented over a |
have huge coefficients. For univariate factorization over finite |
simple extension often have huge coefficients. For univariate |
fields, equal degree factorization and Cantor-Zassenhaus algorithm are |
factorization over finite fields, equal degree factorization and |
implemented. We can use various representation of finite fields: |
Cantor-Zassenhaus algorithm are implemented. We can use various |
$GF(p)$ with a machine integer prime $p$, $GF(p)$ and $GF(p^n)$ with |
representation of finite fields: $GF(p)$ with a machine integer prime |
any odd prime $p$, $GF(2^n)$ with a bit-array representation of |
$p$, $GF(p)$ and $GF(p^n)$ with any odd prime $p$, $GF(2^n)$ with a |
polynomials over $GF(2)$ and $GF(p^n)$ with small $p^n$ represented by |
bit-array representation of polynomials over $GF(2)$ and $GF(p^n)$ |
a primitive root. For multivariate factorization over the rationals, |
with small $p^n$ represented by a primitive root. For multivariate |
the classical EZ(Extended Zassenhaus) type algorithm is implemented. |
factorization over {\bf Q}, the classical EZ(Extended |
|
Zassenhaus) type algorithm is implemented. |
|
|
\subsection{Other functions} |
\subsection{Other functions} |
By applying Groebner basis computation and polynomial factorization, |
By applying Groebner basis computation and polynomial factorization, |
Line 210 Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, which are eas |
|
Line 213 Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, which are eas |
|
implemented but may not be well known. |
implemented but may not be well known. |
We use the following notations. |
We use the following notations. |
\begin{description} |
\begin{description} |
\item $Id(F)$ : a polynomial ideal generated by $F$ |
\item $Id(F)$ : a polynomial ideal generated by a polynomial set $F$ |
\item $\phi_p$ : the canonical projection from ${\bf Z}$ onto $GF(p)$ |
\item $\phi_p$ : the canonical projection from ${\bf Z}$ onto $GF(p)$ |
\item $HT(f)$ : the head term of a polynomial with respect to a term order |
\item $HT(f)$ : the head term of a polynomial with respect to a term order |
\item $HC(f)$ : the head coefficient of a polynomial with respect to a term order |
\item $HC(f)$ : the head coefficient of a polynomial with respect to a term order |
\end{description} |
\end{description} |
|
|
\subsection{Combination of homogenization and trace lifting} |
\subsection{Combination of homogenization and trace lifting} |
|
\label{gbhomo} |
|
|
Traverso's trace lifting algorithm can be |
Traverso's trace lifting algorithm can be |
formulated in an abstract form as follows \cite{FPARA}. |
formulated in an abstract form as follows (c.f. \cite{FPARA}). |
\begin{tabbing} |
\begin{tabbing} |
Input : a finite subset $F \subset {\bf Z}[X]$\\ |
Input : a finite subset $F \subset {\bf Z}[X]$\\ |
Output : a Groebner basis $G$ of $Id(F)$ with respect to a term order $<$\\ |
Output : a Groebner basis $G$ of $Id(F)$ with respect to a term order $<$\\ |
Line 252 The input is homogenized to suppress intermediate coef |
|
Line 256 The input is homogenized to suppress intermediate coef |
|
of intermediate basis elements. The number of zero normal forms may |
of intermediate basis elements. The number of zero normal forms may |
increase by the homogenization, but they are detected over |
increase by the homogenization, but they are detected over |
$GF(p)$. Finally, by dehomogenizing the candidate we can expect that |
$GF(p)$. Finally, by dehomogenizing the candidate we can expect that |
lots of redundant elements can be removed. We will show later that this is |
lots of redundant elements can be removed. |
surely efficient for some input polynomial sets. |
|
|
|
\subsection{Minimal polynomial computation by modular method} |
\subsection{Minimal polynomial computation by modular method} |
|
|
Let $I$ be a zero-dimensional ideal in $R={\bf Q}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$. |
Let $I$ be a zero-dimensional ideal in $R={\bf Q}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$. |
Then the minimal polynomial $m(x_i)$ of a variable $x_i$ in $R/I$ can |
Then the minimal polynomial $m(x_i)$ of a variable $x_i$ in $R/I$ can |
be computed by a partial FGLM \cite{FGLM}, but it often takes long |
be computed by a partial FGLM \cite{FGLM}, but it often takes long |
Line 276 In this algorithm, $m_p$ can be obtained by a partial |
|
Line 280 In this algorithm, $m_p$ can be obtained by a partial |
|
$GF(p)$ because $\phi_p(G)$ is a Groebner basis. Once we know the |
$GF(p)$ because $\phi_p(G)$ is a Groebner basis. Once we know the |
candidate of $\deg(m(x_i))$, $m(x_i)$ can be determined by solving a |
candidate of $\deg(m(x_i))$, $m(x_i)$ can be determined by solving a |
system of linear equations via the method of indeterminate |
system of linear equations via the method of indeterminate |
coefficient. Arguments on \cite{NOYO} ensures that $m(x_i)$ is what we |
coefficient, and it can be solved efficiently by $p$-adic method. |
want if it exists. Note that the full FGLM can also be computed by the |
Arguments on \cite{NOYO} ensures that $m(x_i)$ is what we want if it |
same method. |
exists. Note that the full FGLM can also be computed by the same |
|
method. |
|
|
\subsection{Integer contents reduction} |
\subsection{Integer contents reduction} |
|
\label{gbcont} |
|
|
In some cases the cost to remove integer contents during normal form |
In some cases the cost to remove integer contents during normal form |
computations is dominant. We can remove the content of an integral |
computations is dominant. We can remove the content of an integral |
Line 289 polynomial $f$ efficiently by the following method \ci |
|
Line 295 polynomial $f$ efficiently by the following method \ci |
|
Input : an integral polynomial $f$\\ |
Input : an integral polynomial $f$\\ |
Output : a pair $(\cont(f),f/\cont(f))$\\ |
Output : a pair $(\cont(f),f/\cont(f))$\\ |
$g_0 \leftarrow$ an estimate of $\cont(f)$ such that $\cont(f)|g_0$\\ |
$g_0 \leftarrow$ an estimate of $\cont(f)$ such that $\cont(f)|g_0$\\ |
Write $f$ as $f = g_0q+r$ by division with remainder for each coefficient\\ |
Write $f$ as $f = g_0q+r$ by division with remainder by $g_0$ for each coefficient\\ |
If $r = 0$ then return $(g_0,q)$\\ |
If $r = 0$ then return $(g_0,q)$\\ |
else return $(g,g_0/g \cdot q + r/g)$, where $g = \GCD(g_0,\cont(r))$ |
else return $(g,g_0/g \cdot q + r/g)$, where $g = \GCD(g_0,\cont(r))$ |
\end{tabbing} |
\end{tabbing} |
By separating the set of coefficients of $f$ into two subsets and by |
By separating the set of coefficients of $f$ into two subsets and by |
computing GCD of sums in the elements in the subsets we can estimate |
computing GCD of sums of the elements in each subset we can estimate |
$g_0$ with high accuracy. Then other components are easily computed. |
$g_0$ with high accuracy. Then other components are easily computed. |
|
|
%\subsection{Demand loading of reducers} |
%\subsection{Demand loading of reducers} |
Line 328 algorithm over $GF(32003)$, Singular\cite{SINGULAR} sh |
|
Line 334 algorithm over $GF(32003)$, Singular\cite{SINGULAR} sh |
|
performance among the three systems. $F_4$ implementation in Risa/Asir |
performance among the three systems. $F_4$ implementation in Risa/Asir |
is faster than the Buchberger algorithm implementation in Singular, |
is faster than the Buchberger algorithm implementation in Singular, |
but it is still several times slower than $F_4$ implementation in FGb |
but it is still several times slower than $F_4$ implementation in FGb |
\cite{FGB}. In Table \ref{gbq}, $C_7$ and $McKay$ can be computed by |
\cite{FGB}. In Table \ref{gbq}, Risa/Asir computed $C_7$ and $McKay$ |
the Buchberger algorithm with the methods described in Section |
by the Buchberger algorithm with the methods described in Section |
\ref{gbtech}. It is obvious that $F_4$ implementation in Risa/Asir |
\ref{gbhomo} and \ref{gbcont}. It is obvious that $F_4$ |
over {\bf Q} is too immature. Nevertheless the timing of $McKay$ is |
implementation in Risa/Asir over {\bf Q} is too immature. Nevertheless |
greatly reduced. Fig. \ref{f4vsbuch} explains why $F_4$ is efficient |
the timing of $McKay$ is greatly reduced. Fig. \ref{f4vsbuch} |
in this case. The figure shows that the Buchberger algorithm produces |
explains why $F_4$ is efficient in this case. The figure shows that |
normal forms with huge coefficients for S-polynomials after the 250-th |
the Buchberger algorithm produces normal forms with huge coefficients |
one, which are the computations in degree 16. However, we know that |
for S-polynomials after the 250-th one, which are the computations in |
the reduced basis elements have much smaller coefficients after |
degree 16. However, we know that the reduced basis elements have much |
removing contents. As $F_4$ algorithm automatically produces the |
smaller coefficients after removing contents. As $F_4$ algorithm |
reduced ones, the degree 16 computation is quite easy in $F_4$. |
automatically produces the reduced ones, the degree 16 computation is |
|
quite easy in $F_4$. |
|
|
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{table}[hbtp] |
\begin{center} |
\begin{center} |
Line 454 the univariate factorizer implements only classical |
|
Line 461 the univariate factorizer implements only classical |
|
algorithms and its behavior is what one expects, |
algorithms and its behavior is what one expects, |
that is, it shows average performance in cases |
that is, it shows average performance in cases |
where there are little extraneous factors, but |
where there are little extraneous factors, but |
shows poor performance for hard to factor polynomials. |
shows poor performance for hard to factor polynomials with |
|
many extraneous factors. |
|
|
\section{OpenXM and Risa/Asir OpenXM interfaces} |
\section{OpenXM and Risa/Asir OpenXM interfaces} |
|
|
Line 504 We show a typical OpenXM session. |
|
Line 512 We show a typical OpenXM session. |
|
[[1,1],[x^4+y*x^3+y^2*x^2+y^3*x+y^4,1], |
[[1,1],[x^4+y*x^3+y^2*x^2+y^3*x+y^4,1], |
[x^4-y*x^3+y^2*x^2-y^3*x+y^4,1],[x-y,1],[x+y,1]] |
[x^4-y*x^3+y^2*x^2-y^3*x+y^4,1],[x-y,1],[x+y,1]] |
[5] ox_cmo_rpc(P,"fctr,",x^10000-2^10000*y^10000); |
[5] ox_cmo_rpc(P,"fctr,",x^10000-2^10000*y^10000); |
/* call factorizer; an utility function */ |
/* call factorizer; a utility function */ |
0 |
0 |
[6] ox_reset(P); /* reset the computation in the server */ |
[6] ox_reset(P); /* reset the computation in the server */ |
1 |
1 |
Line 516 We show a typical OpenXM session. |
|
Line 524 We show a typical OpenXM session. |
|
|
|
An application {\tt ox\_asir} is a wrapper of {\tt asir} and provides |
An application {\tt ox\_asir} is a wrapper of {\tt asir} and provides |
all the functions of {\tt asir} to OpenXM clients. It completely |
all the functions of {\tt asir} to OpenXM clients. It completely |
implements the OpenXM reset protocol and also provides remote |
implements the OpenXM reset protocol and also allows remote |
debugging of user programs running on the server. As an example we |
debugging of user programs running on the server. As an example we |
show a program for checking whether a polynomial set is a Groebner |
show a program for checking whether a polynomial set is a Groebner |
basis or not. A client executes {\tt gbcheck()} and servers execute |
basis or not. A client executes {\tt gbcheck()} and servers execute |
{\tt sp\_nf\_for\_gbcheck()} which is a simple normal form computation |
{\tt sp\_nf\_for\_gbcheck()} which is a simple normal form computation |
of a S-polynomial. First of all the client collects all critical pairs |
of an S-polynomial. First of all the client collects all critical pairs |
necessary for the check. Then the client requests normal form |
necessary for the check. Then the client requests normal form |
computations to idling servers. If there are no idling servers the |
computations to idling servers. If there are no idling servers the |
clients waits for some servers to return results by {\tt |
clients waits for some servers to return results by {\tt |
Line 565 def gbcheck(B,V,O,Procs) { |
|
Line 573 def gbcheck(B,V,O,Procs) { |
|
|
|
\subsection{Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a}} |
\subsection{Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a}} |
|
|
Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a} includes functions simulating the |
Asir OpenXM library {\tt libasir.a} contains functions simulating the |
stack machine commands supported in {\tt ox\_asir}. By linking {\tt |
stack machine commands supported in {\tt ox\_asir}. By linking {\tt |
libasir.a} an application can use the same functions as in {\tt |
libasir.a} an application can use the same functions as in {\tt |
ox\_asir} without accessing to {\tt ox\_asir} via TCP/IP. There is |
ox\_asir} without accessing to {\tt ox\_asir} via TCP/IP. There is |
also a stack, which can be manipulated by library functions. In |
also a stack, which can be manipulated by the library functions. In |
order to make full use of this interface, one has to prepare |
order to make full use of this interface, one has to prepare |
conversion functions between CMO and the data structures proper to the |
conversion functions between CMO and the data structures proper to the |
application. A function {\tt asir\_ox\_pop\_string()} is provided to |
application itself. A function {\tt asir\_ox\_pop\_string()} is |
convert CMO to a human readable form, which may be sufficient for a |
provided to convert CMO to a human readable form, which may be |
simple use of this interface. |
sufficient for a simple use of this interface. |
|
|
\section{Concluding remarks} |
\section{Concluding remarks} |
We have shown the current status of Risa/Asir and its OpenXM |
We have shown the current status of Risa/Asir and its OpenXM |
Line 585 Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, many techniqu |
|
Line 593 Groebner basis computation over {\bf Q}, many techniqu |
|
practical performances have been implemented. As the OpenXM interface |
practical performances have been implemented. As the OpenXM interface |
specification is completely documented, we can easily add another |
specification is completely documented, we can easily add another |
function to Risa/Asir by wrapping an existing software system as an OX |
function to Risa/Asir by wrapping an existing software system as an OX |
server, and vice versa. User program debugger can be used both for |
server, and other clients can call functions in Risa/Asir by |
local and remote debugging. By combining the debugger and the function |
implementing the OpenXM client interface. With the remote debugging |
to reset servers, one will be able to enjoy parallel and distributed |
and the function to reset servers, one will be able to enjoy parallel |
computation with OpenXM facilities. |
and distributed computation with OpenXM facilities. |
% |
% |
\begin{thebibliography}{7} |
\begin{thebibliography}{7} |
% |
% |
Line 640 Journal of Symbolic Computation, 28, 1, 243--263. |
|
Line 648 Journal of Symbolic Computation, 28, 1, 243--263. |
|
OpenXM committers (2000-2001) |
OpenXM committers (2000-2001) |
OpenXM package. |
OpenXM package. |
{\tt http://www.openxm.org}. |
{\tt http://www.openxm.org}. |
|
|
|
\bibitem{RUR} |
|
Rouillier, R. (1996) |
|
R\'esolution des syst\`emes z\'ero-dimensionnels. |
|
Doctoral Thesis(1996), University of Rennes I, France. |
|
|
\bibitem{SY} |
\bibitem{SY} |
Shimoyama, T., Yokoyama, K. (1996) |
Shimoyama, T., Yokoyama, K. (1996) |